Trail of Tears Essay -- American History

Trail of Tears Within United States History, there has been some horrible discrimination upon certain races of people. At the trail of tears native Americans were persecuted against heavily. Until 1828 the federal government had Cherokee rights to their land and in that same year Andrew Jackson was elected president and this all ended. On September 15, 1830, at Little Dancing Rabbit Creek, the Chiefs of tribes and representatives of the United States met to discuss a bill recently passed by the Congress. This day started with all the same good intentions of those today but ended with only a few Native Americans signing the treaty which allowing for the removal of all Indian peoples to the west of the Mississippi River. ( Brill, The Trail of tears: The Cherokee journey from home.) The Choctaw were told that the Americans in Washington cared little for the situation. They wanted the Choctaw moved on their own, or by military force. The Indians were believed to be ignorant savages, but they were industrious farmers, merchants, and businessmen of all types. Some were educated people, many were Christians. They even had an organized system of government and a codified body of law. Some of these people were not even Indians, some were strangers and orphans had been taken in over the years. These were people who did not deserve what they went through. When the Chiefs and Warriors signed the treaty, they had come to the realization that they had no option. For doing this the government officials guaranteed to the Indians the body of the treaty, safe conveyance to our new homes. (You cannot forget that in this treaty, the Choctaw traded 10.3 million acres of land east of the Mississippi for 10.3 acres in Oklahoma and Arkansas that we already owned under previous treaties.) Further, it included provisions and monetary annuities, to assist the people to make a new start. One half of the people were to depart almost immediately, the rest the next year. On March 27, 1838, congress did not accept the request for the relief of the Cherokee. Many then saw their land and property sold before their own eyes. The "conveyances" promised turn out to be a forced march. it was said that "...seven thousand soldiers swooped over the nation causing the Cherokees to suffer greatly" and also the troops were ordered "To use guns and swords if necessary to punish any Cherokee who t... ... and then were treated unfairly by the government. Jackson spiced everything up for the people in his speeches but in real life ironically forgot that if it were not for an Indian he would be dead himself. ("Andrew Jackson's case for removal of the Indians). Really the only thing that Jackson wanted was manifest destiny and more land for America. He was simply an opportunist given a chance and he took it. Everyone believed that the trail of tears, the Indian removal or whatever other name that you can give to it was something good for America. A land based on freedom and equality but something like this can happen. For the "good" of the Indians, Andrew Jackson humbly believed, but was it truly for the profit of himself and the country first before the "good" of the Indians ("Andrew Jackson's case for removal of the Indians). Works Cited Ellis, Jerry. Walking the trail: One man's journey along the Cherokee Trail of Tears. New York: Dell Publishing, 1991. "Andrew Jackson" Andrew Jackson's Case for the Removal of Indians. Online. America Online. 20 March 2001. Brill, Marlene Tars. The Trail of Tears: The Cherokee Journey from home. Connecticut: The Millbrook Press, Inc., 1995.

Abraham Lincoln’s Political and Moral Slavery Dilemma Essay

The sixteenth President of the United States of America, the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln casts quite a historical shadow over any other competing figure. Lincoln was brought into the world on February 12th, 1809 to an incredibly modest upbringing in which he would mold himself into a successful lawyer and later a politician. Abraham received little formal education during his childhood, eventually acquainting himself with the law through the apprenticeship system. After rising through the Illinois legislature structure, Lincoln went on to serve in the House of Representatives on behalf of the state of Illinois before gaining widespread recognition from his debates with competing Senate candidate Stephen A. Douglas in 1858. The expansion of slavery into the United States new territories was the hotly contested issue of these debates, Lincoln’s stance would eventually propel him into the national spotlight and later the Presidency. See more: Homeless satire essay Abraham Lincoln’s views on slavery were split between his political obligations and his moral beliefs, his political actions were influenced by his desire to preserve the Union, and his moral stance on the issue largely stemmed from his deep-seeded belief in the power of the Constitution, not the political or social equality of another race. Abraham Lincoln’s view on slavery was segregated in itself, between how he perceived the issue on a political level and as a moral dilemma facing the United States. Without the understanding of Lincoln’s differentiated objections to the institution that created such a split in the American people, it is difficult to fully grasp how and why Lincoln acted as he did throughout his political career. Lincoln’s first documented objection to slavery began in the Illinois State Legislature, in which he and Dan Stone protested a piece of legislation that disapproved of abolitionism and affirmed that the Constitution made slavery â€Å"sacred to the slave-holding states. † The major objection to this resolution was that the spread of slavery was being advocated based upon the opinions of policy makers, nstead of constitutionally. Lincoln’s hard and fast belief in the power of the Constitution would be an overarching theme throughout his career. This protest of an exceedingly popular piece of legislation, recall that only Lincoln and Dan Stone objected in the Legislature, is a significant display of what kind of character Mr. Lincoln possessed. In the face of an overwhelming majority, with literally no opportunity of overturning the decision and risking unpopular opinions, Lincoln was unafraid to express his undying faith in the Constitution. This theme of continual commitment to the Constitution would go even further in 1854 when the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed. Through Lincoln’s eyes, this Act was a clear violation of the Missouri Compromise of 1830, which in effect prohibited the spread of slavery into any newly acquired American territories. Lincoln, at this time running for the Illinois House of Representatives, especially opposes the Kansas-Nebraska Act because of what it implies about the United States government. This Act allows popular sovereignty to decide the legality of slavery in Kansas, in theory the people of the new territory may decide for themselves on the issue. On principle, one must consider that Lincoln could have not been a larger promoter of the idea of popular sovereignty, due to his strong belief in constitutionality. However, issues arise when the Act that is passed is in clear violation of another. The practical repealing of the Missouri Compromise is a major sticking point in this case. Lincoln views this as the government of the United States essentially saying one thing, and then doing another. The so called indifference towards the spread of slavery is in fact a promotion of the institution. This Act simply promotes the profits of the slavery institution, an act of self-interest that deeply disturbs Lincoln. The slavery issue does impact him on a moral level, because of the injustice upon the individual, but this is not where his greatest objection lies. The tendency towards self-interested legislation instead of deriving power from the Constitution is the largest fear of Lincoln during this era. The entire institution of slavery has manifested this self-interest, Lincoln quarrels much more with the political element of this development rather than the moral. While campaigning for, and serving as the President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln’s view on slavery depended on the most effective way to preserve the Union. When first entering his Presidency, Lincoln in fact did not want to interfere with the institution of slavery as it currently stood. As stated in his letter to George T. M. Davis prior to becoming President, â€Å"Of course the declaration that there is no intention to interfere with slaves or slavery, in the states, with all that is fairly implied in such declaration, is true. † Lincoln viewed himself as not only the leader of the United States, but also as the protector of the Constitution. Due to this view of himself, Lincoln was a promoter of gradual emancipation of slaves as a way to compromise the raging extremes of abolitionists and those of the promotion of slavery. However, the Southern states were not receptive of the notion of gradually allowing this institution to fall away. On September 22, 1862 Lincoln issued the Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, which claimed, â€Å"all persons held as slaves within any state, or designated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free. † The Proclamation declared that the states that were in fact rebelling against the Union, had one-hundred days to cooperate with the government. The Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in effect, was Lincoln’s final attempt to end the Civil War in a peaceful manner and preserve the Union. While being a proponent of the gradual emancipation resolution to the slavery issue, Lincoln’s moral stance on the institution largely stemmed from his belief in the power of the Constitution. Lincoln states his response to witnessing slavery in personal letters, â€Å"I confess I hate to see the poor creatures hunted down, and caught, and carried back to their stripes, and unrewarded toils; but I bite my lip and keep quiet. † As well as, â€Å"That sight was a continual torment to me. † Although personally saddened by the harsh realities of slavery, Lincoln’s moral stance was expressed through his plans for colonization of the slaves. The President’s proposal to a group of highly educated black men on August 14th, 1862 included a plan for a coal colony in Central America. Lincoln’s rationale for colonization as he expressed it to his audience that day, â€Å"But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on equality with the white race. You are cut off from many of the advantages which the other race enjoy. The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent, not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of ours. Although he did not explicitly explain to these gentlemen, Lincoln was justifying his plan of colonization through the Constitution. By stating that the black race would not enjoy the same advantageous of the other race, Lincoln is referencing the Bill of Rights and entitlement to the vote. Lincoln’s intentions seem to be well, he would like the slaves to be in a place where they are not persecuted, but his intentions stem from his deep conviction in the power of the Constitution. Abraham Lincoln’s view of slavery was differentiated between his political obligations and the moral element of the institution. While in his Presidency, his political actions were influenced by the desire to preserve the Union. Lincoln’s moral stance toward slavery was largely shaped by his fierce belief in the power and importance of the Constitution. The findings of the analysis seem to suggest that Abraham Lincoln may not be the â€Å"Great Emancipator† as many elementary history curriculums state. Also, that the primary motives behind the Emancipation Proclamation could have been to coerce the rebelling states into cooperating with the Union, instead of freeing those locked into the institution of slavery.

Expectation Vs. Reality The New World Essay - 1362 Words

Expectation v. Reality – The New World During the early exploring of the American continent in the 1500s and 1600s, the New World seemed to be untouched land only inhabited by native, primitive people. It was believed to be the literal Garden Eden, a world without human sins, and the perfect balance between humans and nature. However, when the English first started to settle along the East coast, the reality of this New World appeared to not be as perfect and utopic as they thought: Attacks and conflicts between the natives and settlers, the lack of civilization, and dangerous winter conditions surfaced. Nevertheless, for many settlers, the new land was promising and gave those a chance who were unable to live a happy life in Europe. The term American Experience refers to the idea of America as a place with endless possibilities and opportunities for everyone, especially in a religious sense emerging from the religious conflicts in Europe during the 1500s and 1600s. However, the term also includes the reality that the earliest settlers encountered, which did not always match their expectations. Early American literature written by Captain John Smith, William Bradford, Mary Rowlandson, and Benjamin Franklin present their personal American Experience. While the different authors offer perspective on a multitude of aspects of the American life, such as religion, dealing with the Natives, economy, and virtues, their conclusion is similar: America can be everything it promises,Show MoreRelatedCatcher In The Rye Analysis909 Words   |  4 Pagesthe acceptance of the complexities and â€Å"grayness† of the world, confrontation with the adult world, and the individual needs and desires vs. external pressures/expe ctations/norms. In both novels, young boys are faced with tough choices that will later help them in the overall transition from childhood to adulthood in several different forms. In both novels each character faces the impeccable journey of accepting the grayness of the world. Junior, the main character of The Absolutely True Diary ofRead MoreAnalysis Of Millennials : The Me Me Me Generation872 Words   |  4 PagesGeneration† a Writing Analysis by Roma Bhatia In the article â€Å"Millennials: The Me Me Me Generation,† Joel Stein asserts that although millennials’ behavior is narcissistic, entitled and accompanied by laziness, they have found their own success in the world. He develops this declaration by first pointing out the generation’s flaws, then recognizing their success and adaptations to their environment as well. Stein’s purpose is to acknowledge the flaws of the millennial generation in order to realize theirRead MoreThe Nature Of Organizations And The Contemporary Environment1294 Words   |  6 Pagesmy reading I have found that culture is defined as the shared intellectual programming of the human mind which differentiates one group of individuals from another group. It has often been understood that statements about culture do not describe â€Å"reality†; they are all general and relative†. Often times you will find that dependent upon the person, culture can be very subjective, mean ing everyone sees things in a different view forming their personal opinions. According to this weeks’ case study weRead MoreIntentional Revolutions Is Organizational Change1218 Words   |  5 Pagesin dramatically new and different ways, as opposed to making small improvements in current practices. The requirements for remaining competitive often include sharp breaks with past beliefs and practices. There is need for organizations of all kinds to make discontinuous changes in significant aspects of their being. To make revolution is to attack values and practices that are valued or cherished or accepted within the prevailing culture. Slide 1 Transformation – creation of a new organizationalRead MoreThe New Testament Kingdom Is Both Present And Future Essay1180 Words   |  5 PagesTorrance states, â€Å"The New Testament kingdom is both present and future† (Torrance Walker, 2009, p. 404). Understanding that concept is not only perplexing, the idea of articulating it when in conversation with a nonbeliever, or a believer for that matter, is most challenging. The obvious place to begin then is to go straight to God’s Word. Of course, we look to the Gospels, and also the Epistles; Paul’s letter to the Romans in particular, overflows with the hope which undergirds Christian faithRead MoreEssay Personal Worldview642 Words   |  3 Pagesexclude new advancements in science which will enable the proof of other existence. Postmodern worldview focuses on the benefits of science and recognizes that science alone cannot give meaning to life. These theorists say the world is made up of energy and this energy can be manipulated (Shelly Miller, 2006). These theorists no longer endorse dualism which focuses on good vs. evil but welcome the philosophy which no longer separates spiritual from material realities. Prime reality is definedRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Tragic Art Essay1417 Words   |  6 Pageschoral portion†¦Ã¢â‚¬ (Aristotle, 2324), but does a plot need to be so planned? The plot should have some structure, but it should also flow naturally and freely. If there is too much planning going on in the plot, than the storyline will be too predictable. New ideas and turning points should be part of the story in order to keep the audience on their toes. The scenes of the plot can be about realistic events or about imaginary events. If the events are realistic it may appeal more to the audience in a personalRead MoreAnalysis Of Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World1389 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories.† – Sun Tzu. A quote meaningless to an essay analyzing Scott Pilgrim VS. The World (Edgar Wright, 2010). This attempt at humor is like the humor within Scott Pilgrim VS. The World, and despite being used frequently never truly dulls throughout the film’s progression. Yet the biggest kicker for the film is the originality, not settling for typical special effects and soundtracks. Instead leaning in favor to create an exceedinglyRead MoreSchool Setting An Open Door Policy Essay958 Words   |  4 Pageshorizons of expectations differ, of course, not only in their being more or less conscious, but also in their content (Mezirow, 1991). It is inevitable that these debates include differing opinions and values. Public schools suffer from a divergence between public perception and measurable reality. A few unfortunate experiences potentially create negative and damaging reputations. Once the bad news stirs, people deliver opinions, and the public school reputation begins to falter. The news media immediatelyRead MoreThe Media And Federal Government1619 Words   |  7 Pageswhich shocks many viewers, and is completely fallacious . Entertainment media is hugely impactful; the majority of Americans watch television, so these inaccurate depictions of mentally ill characters shape how thousands view the mentally disabled. News broadcasts and reports are equally culpable in their portrayal of mentally challenged individuals. In the fight to gain an interested audience, reporters â€Å"sell† stories instead of simply â€Å"telling† them. As a result, mental illness is overemphasized